Tag Archives: M-Step

School News Network: Michigan’s New ‘Read by Grade 3’ Law: A Guide for Parents

By Sunli Joy
Research Data Analyst for KentISD
School News Network


The new school year is finally here. Parents helping their younger children transition into the regular routine of daily school attendance will find a new focus on reading as their schools and their teachers prepare students for Michigan’s new law requiring demonstrated reading competency to move from the third to fourth grade. 

In Spring 2020, third grade students will take the state’s M-STEP assessment as before, but all eyes will be on their reading scores. The M-STEP English Language Arts test will be used to determine whether students will be able to move onto the fourth grade or not. There are a number of conditions beyond the test score to be considered before a student is retained in third grade. All are new and should be understood by parents who will want to know all their options if their child’s reading score is low enough to trigger possible retention under Michigan’s “Read by Grade 3” law. 

Where does this new retention requirement come from?

In the fall of 2016, the state legislature passed Public Act 306, also known as Michigan’s “Read by Grade 3” law. The law’s authors identify third grade as a critical point in a child’s educational career, marking the transition from “learning to read” to “reading to learn”. They maintain a child who cannot read well by the end of the third grade will struggle in future years to meet proficiency levels if their reading skills are insufficient to allow their understanding of core concepts in all subject areas. These concerns are borne out in student and school performance data, particularly for students of color and those who are economically disadvantaged. 

While much of the law lays out foundational strategies to improve reading proficiency, its most controversial aspect is the retention of students who are unable to meet minimum state reading expectations as measured by their performance on the M-STEP third-grade reading assessment. This is not unique to Michigan. As of 2018, twenty-nine states plus the District of Columbia had retention policies on the books.

What are the specific requirements for retention?

Beginning with third graders in 2019-20, a student will not be able to move onto fourth grade unless any one of the following occur:

  1. The student attains a minimum score of at least 1253 on the third grade English Language Arts portion of M-STEP. M-STEP scores range from 1203 to 1357. To learn more about the M-STEP, be sure to check out this primer.
  2. The student demonstrates reading proficiency through a state-approved alternative assessment.
  3. The student demonstrates reading proficiency through a classroom student portfolio.



No later than June 1, or 14 days after M-STEP assessment results are made available (whichever is earlier) each year, a letter must be sent to each household in which a student’s scores fall below the minimum threshold. 

Students who demonstrate proficiency on the other subjects of the M-STEP, along with mastery of social studies and science through their coursework, would still be eligible to move onto grade four.

For those students retained in grade three, schools and districts must provide additional supports, interventions and resources in the subsequent school year. A student who is retained in grade three as a result of this law cannot be retained at that same grade level again for failure to meet adequate reading standards.

Is it possible for a student to be exempt from the retention requirement?

There are several “good cause” exemptions from retention. A student may be granted a “good cause” exemption under any one of the following conditions:

  1. The student has an individualized education program (IEP) or Section 504 plan, and is granted an exemption by the school.
  2. The student is an English Learner with fewer than three years of English language instruction.
  3. The student was previously retained in kindergarten, grade one, grade two or grade three, and had previously received intensive reading intervention for at least two years prior.
  4. The student had been enrolled in their current school or district for less than two years, but was not provided an adequate individual reading improvement plan.
  5. The superintendent grants a good cause exemption, after being successfully petitioned by a parent or legal guardian. 



What is the process for a parent to petition for a “good cause” exemption?

Within 30 days of receiving an official M-STEP notification letter, a parent or legal guardian may choose to seek out a “good cause” exemption for their child. To do so, the parent or legal guardian must first reach out to their child’s teacher, who then passes along their recommendation to the district superintendent.

The superintendent’s decision is final, and must be communicated to the family at least 30 days before the beginning of the upcoming school year.

How many students may potentially be retained under the new law?

While we won’t know until Spring 2020 the number of students potentially retained within Kent ISD, it is possible to look back at the last five years of M-STEP data to get a rough approximation.

Looking at M-STEP data from 2014-15 through 2018-19, we estimate about 2-3 percent of third-grade students may be subject to retention. In 2018-19, this accounts for roughly 170 students in Kent ISD’s 20 traditional school districts. To note, these figures only represent the ceiling, as it doesn’t account for any exemptions from the law.

In terms of who may be potentially retained, our analysis finds these students will likely be disproportionately low-income and students of color. For example, while low-income students make up about half of all third graders in Kent ISD’s traditional school districts, they may make up about 80 percent of all retentions. Likewise, while students of color only account for about 40 percent of students, they could easily comprise up to 75 percent of all retained students. 

The supports and strategies for improved achievement contained in the law — and additional state and federal funding targeted for “at-risk” students — are intended to provide additional services for these groups. Decades of data demonstrate economically disadvantaged students do not respond or perform as well on standardized tests. Their higher-income peers, on the other hand, enjoy greater financial security and can provide a broader range of educational experiences and support, if necessary. 

Roughly 2-3 percent of Kent ISD area third grade students may be subject to retention under new “Read by Grade 3” Law

Data for Kent ISD include only LEA districts. MDE’s May 2019 retention guidance requires students with a scale score of 1252 or lower on the grade 3 M-STEP in ELA be subject to retention, barring any ‘good cause’ exemptions. Source: MDE, M-STEP English Language Arts 2018-19



Low-Income students and students of color may be disproportionately impacted by Michigan’s “Read by Grade 3” Law…

Data for Kent ISD include only LEA districts. MDE’s May 2019 retention guidance requires students with a scale score of 1252 or lower on the grade 3 M-STEP in ELA be subject to retention, barring any ‘good cause’ exemptions. Source: MDE, M-STEP English Language Arts 2018-19



Does retention actually work as a strategy?

Proponents of retention argue that without this law, schools in Michigan will continue to pass along far too many unprepared students. Those who oppose retention believe it does more harm than good, citing data demonstrating retention policies put students at greater risk for dropping out of high school.

A long-term study of Florida’s reading and retention law — first passed in the early 2000s — provides some important insight. Harvard University researchers concluded students retained under Florida’s reading law exhibited some short-term learning gains but found those benefits tend to fade over time, and are statistically insignificant after six years.

Where do we go from here?

Educators throughout West Michigan and statewide were preparing for this new law well before its passage, working to ensure students have the tools they need to be successful in literacy. This has ranged from literacy coaching, professional development for teachers and other innovative student support strategies. These have been enhanced by new state and regional efforts like the Reading Now NetworkGeneral Education Leadership NetworkMichigan Education Corps and several others.

Educators and university researchers alike are sure to focus on student performance under the new law to determine if retention, or additional student support and literacy coaching for students and teachers alike, will achieve higher proficiency levels. 

If you have further questions, please contact your student’s teachers and building principal to learn what they plan to do to provide support for your child and what you can do to better help your child read. 

Community partners Kent County District Library and the Grand Rapids Public Library worked with local schools and have joined forces to offer after-school assistance for you and your child under their new “Mission Read” program.

School News Network: Stress test:Students speak their minds on the M-STEP

By School News Network

 

Editor’s Note: This is only the comments from students in the Wyoming and Kentwood area. For the complete story, click here.

 

It’s become an annual ritual. Each fall the state releases results of the M-STEP, the state-required standardized test taken by Michigan students to gauge their proficiency in reading, math, social studies and science. And each fall educators, parents and pundits wring their hands over why students aren’t doing better.

 

Rather than go back to the same hand-wringing sources, we decided to ask the people most directly affected by these tests: the students who take them. How do they feel about these tests, and how could the tests be improved?

 

Adults, listen up: Maybe they can teach you something.

 

Kelloggsville Middle School

Gianna Turnbull

Gianna Turnbull, sixth-grader

 

Gianna dreams of being a baker someday. She recalls taking the M-STEP last year.

 

“I was anxious,” she said. “Some of the questions on the math test were confusing. I felt like I was gonna fail.”

 

Gianna said she took the M-STEP “very seriously. I sat at a desk where nobody could distract me.”

 

She wasn’t sure how the test will help students, but suspects it could help predict what kinds of things they could do in the future. Despite not enjoying the experience, Gianna said, “I think students should take the test so the state knows what the school’s teaching you.”

 

Jonathan Mubake

Jonathan Mubake, sixth-grader

 

When he sat for the M-STEP, “I was messed up!” Jonathan said. “My brain was somewhere else. …. It was like two computers (were) connected to me! I was trying to read (the page) as fast as I can, but it’s 10 paragraphs long!”

 

He said social studies was the hardest topic for him.

 

“I was exhausted, my head hurt, and my feet were wobbly,” he said, from his foot shaking out of nervousness. “I was ready to eat my food and go outside and go play. I was just ready for that, until I had to go back into the room and do the whole thing over again.

 

Jonathan would like five weeks’ notice to prepare for future standardized tests.

 

“I would prepare mentally. I would eat a perfect breakfast in the morning, get ready for school, make sure I had the right clothing on — not uncomfortable — so it’s not too tight for me to do my thing. I would go to sleep at … I would say 8, so I get enough rest.”

 

Crestwood Middle School, Kentwood

Kamau Brame

 

Kamau Brame, seventh-grader

 

Kamau said M-STEP tests give students an idea of how they are doing in different subjects, but sometimes the process gets a bit complicated.

 

“I don’t particularly look forward to them, but I don’t mind doing them. They aren’t too tedious. The teachers know what you already know and what you need to go over more.”

 

Math is hardest for him. “I find some questions super-easy and some I have no idea what to start with. … Once you get a few questions right you start getting really hard ones, and you kind of stress out because you know you’re not getting those right.”

 

He sees testing as helpful for later grades, with the “big-test SAT and ACT and all that. It gets you used to having to prep for tests and taking them under pressure.” But he’d like to spend less time on setup. “I would change all the stuff you have to do before each test. … It’s like a long process signing in and all that.”

 

The atmosphere at school can be a bit tense during testing, he said. “Last year some other grades told us how bad it was. … The anticipation is the worst.”

Erna Kljaic-Dugalic

 

Erna Kljaic-Dugalic, seventh-grader

 

Erna said she mostly takes the testing in stride.

 

“I don’t mind the M-STEP, but I don’t get stressed out about it. I usually finish early because I don’t second-guess myself.”

 

But math can be a bit hard on her nerves, because it “starts easy and then gets harder and harder. It doesn’t really stress me out, but it makes me feel like I’m set up for failure. I also get really tired from looking at the screen.”

 

She looks at  test results as a way to think about what kind of job she’d be good at. “I do think it does help with your career because it shows your strengths.”

 

That said, she would definitely change the length.

 

“I understand that it’s long for a reason, but I would like it if it was a little bit shorter, maybe like two days, because sometimes it can take up a week for some kids to finish it. I’d like it to be shorter so we have more time for other things  at school.”

Alana Biley

Alana Biley, sixth-grader

 

Overall, M-STEP isn’t too bad, Alana says.

 

“I don’t mind it because it helps you to know what level you’re on and you won’t be on things that are too easy or too hard.”

 

However, it does make her nervous. “I’m just like, ‘Oh gosh!’ I get butterflies in my stomach like a week before.”

 

She’d feel better with more preparation.

 

“I would probably want a pre-test to get you ready for it.”

 

School News Network: Understanding what all the fuss is about: A primer on the M-STEP

By Sunil Joy

Research Data Analyst for Kent ISD

 

Welcome to the 2018-19 school year everyone! Let’s hope this year is our best school year yet. And what better way to kick things off than to talk about state test results, right?

 

Okay, probably not.

 

Sunli Joy

Truth is, the new school year also happens to coincide with the release of the last school year’s state assessment data (2017-18) — the Michigan Student Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP). And for at least a few days annually, the public gets inundated with stories through television, radio, newspapers and social media — all seeking to understand the newest results and their repercussions.Now we realize that most parents have plenty of other things they need to worry about in regards to their child’s education. And it is likely that most busy parents probably don’t fully understand what the fuss is all about, or if M-STEP is something that should warrant their attention. In reality, these results have big implications, meaning we all should have a better understanding of what they are telling us.

 

For these reasons, we decided to go beyond the simple headlines and soundbites, instead, taking a deeper dive into the test’s purpose and implications. It is our hope this information will equip parents with the knowledge necessary to make meaning of the results for themselves.

 

 

Getting Some Background

 

Before diving head first into interpreting the results, it is important to understand the background behind the M-STEP, including the context in which it exists in our state.

 

What is the M-STEP?

 

M-STEP is Michigan’s common assessment system: The M-STEP is Michigan’s mandated state assessment for public elementary and middle school students. The assessment evaluates performance in English Language Arts and Mathematics, along with Science and Social Studies in select grades. The vast majority of public school students—with a few exceptions for special populations—are required to take this assessment during the spring of each school year.

 

Why are students required to take the M-STEP assessment each year and to what end?

 

M-STEP is required by federal and state law, and is designed to measure mastery of state academic standards: In exchange for federal and state dollars, public school students are required to take a statewide assessment for certain subjects and grade-levels each school year (Michigan public school students are required to take the SAT exam in high school). More broadly, these tests are aimed at measuring a student’s performance against the state’s academic standards—the subject-level expectations students should be able meet at the end of each grade-level.

 

My child’s teacher already administers their own tests, why do they need to take the M-STEP too?

 

M-STEP’s primary purpose is to provide a snapshot of end-of-year student learning across the state: When teachers give students assessments throughout the school year, the primary purpose is to gauge their students’ progress, and make adjustments to their instruction as necessary. Parents also get a sense of how their child is advancing during the school year from the assessments teachers prepare.

 

The M-STEP does not serve this purpose. Instead, think of the M-STEP as a final exam you would take in high school. Once the exam is over and you’ve received your results, you can’t simply step inside a time machine and take the exam again. Similarly, once a teacher gets their students’ M-STEP results, the school year has already ended. As a summative assessment rather, the M-STEP’s purpose is to provide a snapshot of student learning over the past school year. And because most public school students statewide take the same assessment every year, it’s possible to compare one school’s results to the next.

 

What happens if my child or school performs poorly on the M-STEP?

 

Poor performance on the M-STEP has real repercussions both for schools and students: The state uses the M-STEP as one of the primary sources for identifying and intervening in schools that are underperforming or failing. Current state law also requires that teachers receive annual performance evaluations, which in part must be based on their students’ state assessment data.

 

And while there historically haven’t been prescribed consequences beyond educators and schools, a 2016 state law passed by the legislature requires students unable to pass the third grade English Language Arts assessment be retained in third grade beginning in 2019-20. Though exemptions for good cause exist, in this example, consequences for poor performance aren’t just for adults, but for students.

How to soundly interpret the M-STEP results

 

Now that you have some background and assuming you are still awake, let’s turn our attention now towards how to best make meaning of the M-STEP.

 

I’ve heard Michigan’s M-STEP scores are not so great. Should I move my child to another state where kids perform much better?

 

Michigan’s results aren’t so unique when compared to other states: With each release of statewide test scores, the recent norm for news stories is to point out that Michigan’s students are falling behind the nation. It would lead one to conclude that something distinctively “bad” is happening in Michigan. But as we’ve highlighted in the past, our state isn’t as unique as some would like us to believe. To further demonstrate this concept, we decided to look at state assessment results from Massachusetts and Tennessee—places that experts had previously identified as top education states—as it compares to M-STEP. What we found were headlines not too different than Michigan. While we realize that every state has its own assessment systems—meaning comparisons aren’t exactly apples to apples—the following examples are here simply to illustrate this idea:

 

  • According to the 2017 Massachusetts assessment results for third grade reading, 47 percent of students were proficient. In Michigan, 44 percent of students were proficient in English Language Arts for 2017 in third grade.
  • In Tennessee, 35 percent of students were proficient on the 2018 Mathematics assessment in grades 6-8. In comparison, 34 percent of students were proficient in Michigan.

 

Now let’s look at a few recent media headlines, putting into perspective our own state’s headlines:

 

  • Massachusetts: “Just half of Massachusetts students met MCAS expectations in 2017”
  • Tennessee: “TNReady testing scores mostly flat, but results dip in high school English”
  • Michigan: “More than half of Michigan students failed M-STEP literacy exam”

 

There are clearly areas for improvement. Is this because teachers are doing a bad job or students simply aren’t that smart?

 

Blaming students or their teachers for subpar results focuses attention in the wrong places: Often when M-STEP results aren’t where they ought to be for a school or district, the immediate inclination is to either blame students or their teachers. This occurs in large part because the major focus of media reporting are often the deficits, with little explanation on “why” such inequities may exist. And when little explanation is provided, it shouldn’t be a surprise that most people would blame either the test takers (students) or the people preparing the test takers (teachers). But by narrowly focusing on teachers and students only, we ignore the systemic reasons that may be contributing to the results. Moreover, this limited mindset distracts us from the questions that need to be answered in order to genuinely move forward:

 

  • Are schools and districts receiving adequate and equitable resources to best support student learning—particularly for disadvantaged students who have historically lagged behind their peers? Students face a diverse set of obstacles every day—ranging anywhere from emotional trauma to access to clean clothes. Research from the School Finance Research Collaborative reveals that despite the diverse obstacles students may face, our state isn’t distributing resources equitably to those students who need them the most.
  • Are we providing schools with relevant and engaging instruction that makes students not only interested in their courses, but able to reach their maximum potential?
  • Are we ensuring educators have access to high-quality instructional or curriculum materials and ongoing professional development, which we know are essential for teaching and learning?
  • Are we proving strategies to address matters that go beyond the four walls of the school building, including in areas like chronic absenteeism?
  • Are we strategizing on approaches to better involve parents/guardians in their child’s education?
  • Are those schools that are truly making an impact or “beating the odds” being promoted as models for success regionally and statewide?

 

Does the M-STEP point to a child’s success later in life?

 

M-STEP is a single data point, and can’t paint the whole story of student success alone: It would be naïve to believe that one assessment given at a single point in time—regardless of quality—can sufficiently predict a child’s future. To be clear, this is not to say M-STEP’s data on content mastery is unimportant. In fact, the Kent Intermediate Superintendent Association (KISA)—a group composed of Kent ISD’s 20 school district superintendents—have anchored three of their four long-term goals on data provided by current state assessment systems.

 

Rather, we know from our business partners in the region that indicators like collaboration, innovation, teamwork and others are just as vital for life success. Albeit difficult to measure, we simply can’t forget that these matter.

 

Our purpose here is to ensure our readers are better informed on this complex, yet important topic in public education. Despite its intricacies, the implications behind the M-STEP are too important to overlook.

 

Ensuring high academic achievement for students is multi-faceted strategy—including the strategic use of data. But it also means understanding what the data is and isn’t telling us. Only by doing so can we truly ensure that success is attainable for all of our students.

 

Check out School News Network for more stories about students, schools, and faculty in West Michigan.